The most disturbing thing about the 24/7 coverage of Reagan's death is the complete ignoring of hapennings in Iraq.
New York Time’s Bob Hebert has an interesting
OpEd piece on how Bush needs to suck it up and be honest with the American people on the true cost of the Iraqi War and the action in Afghanistan. He also includes an interesting point about “the rest of us have been given a pass. The president has not asked us to share in the sacrifice and we haven't demanded the opportunity to do so. We're not even paying for the war. It's being put on credit cards issued in the names of future generations.” This points out that not only are we going into debt at an outrageous rate, but that we are not being asked to personally sacrifice.
How will Ronald Reagan’s death renew and redefine the debate on stem-cell research?
William Saffire thinks it will renew the debate and perhaps lead us to the capability of using stem-cells for disease treatment and therapy.
Pity Christopher West who has the task of trying to put the Catholic church’s prohibitions on sex in a positive light. I guess the one upside to this is that he gets to sell his book and tapes in the lobby after the lecture!
In a “not such a shock” story, the New York Times details how some
campaign consultants and managers go on to be lobbyist—lobbying on behalf of corporations and causes to the candidate they just helped elect. Well, this has been going on for years with former office holders, I guess those that help them get there wanted a piece of the pie, too.
Another Republican loss: The
Supreme Court refuses to hear a case on the Colorado re-re-districting plan
giving a victory to Democrats who won at the appellate level. Perhaps this will change the mind of any other Republican-controlled legislature that might be considering following the path of Texas and Colorado. I believe that our state law-making bodies have better things to do with their time than waste it on redistricting more than once every 10 years.